NATO Turns 75 Amid Global Turmoil It Was Formed to Prevent
What is to become of NATO post-Ukraine?
As NATO turns 75, the world’s best analysts, journalists, and politicos have naturally turned their attention to evaluating the past, present, and prospects of the global collective founded in the aftermath of World War II.
NATO loyalists argue that the organization remains an indispensable cornerstone of global security architecture, its significance enduring as a bulwark against emergent threats to international peace and stability.
They say NATO fosters collective defense, uniting member states in a shared commitment to mutual protection, dissuading aggression, and deterring conflicts — that its strategic cohesion amplifies a diplomatic influence and facilitates cooperation in counterterrorism, cyber defense, and hybrid warfare domains.
According to its supporters, NATO serves as a nexus for transatlantic relations, reaffirming the enduring bonds between North America and Europe. In a world rife with uncertainty, they say NATO’s relevance persists as a vital guarantor of global security.
Others aren’t so sure.
While historically pivotal, NATO’s continued relevance is subject to scrutiny amidst shifting global dynamics. Critics argue that the alliance perpetuates a Cold War-era…